You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Ulcer metastasis? Anatomical locations of recurrence for patients in diabetic foot remission
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2020
Brian J. Petersen, Gary M. Rothenberg, Priti J. Lakhani, Min Zhou, David R. Linders, Jonathan D. Bloom, Katherine A. Wood, David G. Armstrong
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||27||77%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||11%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||11||15%|
|Student > Master||10||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||16||21%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||12||16%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 469,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.