You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Who stays, who drops out? Biosocial predictors of longer-term adherence in participants attending an exercise referral scheme in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Tobi, Emee Vida Estacio, Ge Yu, Adrian Renton, Nena Foster |
| Abstract |
Exercise referral schemes are one of the most popular forms of physical activity intervention in primary care in the UK and present an opportunity to better understand the factors related to exercise adherence. But standard schemes tend to be delivered over a short period and so provide information about the factors associated with short-term adherence. This retrospective register-based study of a longer-duration scheme allowed investigation of longer-term adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 63% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Psychology | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#6,050,858
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,189
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,054
of 165,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#66
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.