You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab compared to standard of care as first line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma in Hong Kong
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-0200-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Herbert H. Loong, Carlos K. H. Wong, Linda K. S. Leung, S. C. Tan, Jason Jen, Mary Y. K. Lee, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Jingshu Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 20% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,087,935
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#264
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,341
of 456,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.