↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Oxygen as a drug

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Oxygen as a drug
Published in
Critical Care, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haim Bitterman

Abstract

Oxygen is one of the most commonly used therapeutic agents. Injudicious use of oxygen at high partial pressures (hyperoxia) for unproven indications, its known toxic potential, and the acknowledged roles of reactive oxygen species in tissue injury led to skepticism regarding its use. A large body of data indicates that hyperoxia exerts an extensive profile of physiologic and pharmacologic effects that improve tissue oxygenation, exert anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects, and augment tissue repair mechanisms. These data set the rationale for the use of hyperoxia in a list of clinical conditions characterized by tissue hypoxia, infection, and consequential impaired tissue repair. Data on regional hemodynamic effects of hyperoxia and recent compelling evidence on its anti-inflammatory actions incited a surge of interest in the potential therapeutic effects of hyperoxia in myocardial revascularization and protection, in traumatic and nontraumatic ischemicanoxic brain insults, and in prevention of surgical site infections and in alleviation of septic and nonseptic local and systemic inflammatory responses. Although the margin of safety between effective and potentially toxic doses of oxygen is relatively narrow, the ability to carefully control its dose, meticulous adherence to currently accepted therapeutic protocols, and individually tailored treatment regimens make it a cost-effective safe drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 197 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 16%
Other 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 63 30%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,165,184
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,898
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,543
of 110,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.