You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Three years follow-up of screen-detected diabetic and non-diabetic subjects: who is better off? The ADDITION Netherlands study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-9-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul GH Janssen, Kees J Gorter, Ronald P Stolk, Mehmet Akarsubasi, Guy EHM Rutten |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |