You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic survey of randomised trials that stopped early for reasons of futility
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-0899-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. D. Walter, H. Han, G. H. Guyatt, D. Bassler, N. Bhatnagar, V. Gloy, S. Schandelmaier, M. Briel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 41% |
United States | 7 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Ireland | 2 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
Scientists | 7 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
Mathematics | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,765,964
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#220
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,196
of 476,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#13
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.