You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga C Damman, Michelle Hendriks, Jany Rademakers, Diana MJ Delnoij, Peter P Groenewegen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,819,534
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,006
of 14,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,460
of 166,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.