You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) evidence base: colloquium proceedings and research direction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Boland, A. Kothari, C. McCutcheon, I. D. Graham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 15 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 47% |
| Scientists | 20 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,227,447
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#114
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,036
of 469,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.