You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Harsha Bangura, Isha Nirola, Poshan Thapa, David Citrin, Bishal Belbase, Bhawana Bogati, Nirmala B.K., Sonu Khadka, Lal Kunwar, Scott Halliday, Nandini Choudhury, Ryan Schwarz, Mukesh Adhikari, S. P. Kalaunee, Sharon Rising, Duncan Maru, Sheela Maru |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 116 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,372
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#822
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,682
of 455,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.