↓ Skip to main content

Online self-administered training for post-traumatic stress disorder treatment providers: design and methods for a randomized, prospective intervention study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online self-administered training for post-traumatic stress disorder treatment providers: design and methods for a randomized, prospective intervention study
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josef I Ruzek, Raymond C Rosen, Lisa Marceau, Mary Jo Larson, Donn W Garvert, Lauren Smith, Anne Stoddard

Abstract

This paper presents the rationale and methods for a randomized controlled evaluation of web-based training in motivational interviewing, goal setting, and behavioral task assignment. Web-based training may be a practical and cost-effective way to address the need for large-scale mental health training in evidence-based practice; however, there is a dearth of well-controlled outcome studies of these approaches. For the current trial, 168 mental health providers treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were assigned to web-based training plus supervision, web-based training, or training-as-usual (control). A novel standardized patient (SP) assessment was developed and implemented for objective measurement of changes in clinical skills, while on-line self-report measures were used for assessing changes in knowledge, perceived self-efficacy, and practice related to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques. Eligible participants were all actively involved in mental health treatment of veterans with PTSD. Study methodology illustrates ways of developing training content, recruiting participants, and assessing knowledge, perceived self-efficacy, and competency-based outcomes, and demonstrates the feasibility of conducting prospective studies of training efficacy or effectiveness in large healthcare systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 47 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 16%
Social Sciences 20 11%
Unspecified 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 53 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,293,766
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,085
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,628
of 164,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.