↓ Skip to main content

Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
81 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial
Published in
Critical Care, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2732-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Kattan, Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón, Jean-Louis Teboul, Ricardo Castro, Maurizio Cecconi, Giorgio Ferri, Jan Bakker, Glenn Hernández

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 17%
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 42 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#616,250
of 22,235,780 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#453
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,440
of 374,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,235,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them