You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What factors affect patients’ access to healthcare? Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-1278-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryony Dawkins, Charlotte Renwick, Tim Ensor, Bethany Shinkins, David Jayne, David Meads |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,975,311
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#740
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,502
of 461,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#20
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.