You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contrast-enhanced, conebeam CT-based, fractionated radiotherapy and follow-up monitoring of orthotopic mouse glioblastoma: a proof-of-concept study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-020-1470-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Stegen, Alexander Nieto, Valerie Albrecht, Jessica Maas, Michael Orth, Klement Neumaier, Sabine Reinhardt, Moritz Weick-Kleemann, Wilfried Goetz, Merle Reinhart, Katia Parodi, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Kirsten Lauber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 26% |
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,047,943
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,293
of 2,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,263
of 453,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#22
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.