You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using research networks to generate trustworthy qualitative public health research findings from multiple contexts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0895-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lot Nyirenda, Meghan Bruce Kumar, Sally Theobald, Malabika Sarker, Musonda Simwinga, Moses Kumwenda, Cheryl Johnson, Karin Hatzold, Elizabeth L. Corbett, Euphemia Sibanda, Miriam Taegtmeyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,597,131
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,535
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,246
of 455,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#36
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.