You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Skin prick testing with extensively heated milk or egg products helps predict the outcome of an oral food challenge: a retrospective analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1710-1492-8-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zein Faraj, Harold L Kim |
Abstract |
Cow's milk and hen's egg are the most frequently encountered food allergens in the pediatric population. Skin prick testing (SPT) with commercial extracts followed by an oral food challenge (OFC) are routinely performed in the diagnostic investigation of these children. Recent evidence suggests that milk-allergic and/or egg-allergic individuals can often tolerate extensively heated (EH) forms of these foods. This study evaluated the predictive value of a negative SPT with EH milk or egg in determining whether a child would tolerate an OFC to the EH food product. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Argentina | 1 | 17% |
Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 44% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Energy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,930,354
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#370
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,159
of 176,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.