You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Task shifting for point-of-care early infant diagnosis: a comparison of the quality of testing between nurses and laboratory personnel in Zimbabwe
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12960-020-0449-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francis M. Simmonds, Jennifer E. Cohn, Haurovi W. Mafaune, Tichaona H. Nyamundaya, Agnes Mahomva, Addmore Chadambuka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,146
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,556
of 471,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.