You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a genetically modified foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine candidate generated by reverse genetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-8-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pinghua Li, Xingwen Bai, Pu Sun, Dong Li, Zengjun Lu, Yimei Cao, Yuanfang Fu, Huifang Bao, Yingli Chen, Baoxia Xie, Zaixin Liu |
| Abstract |
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is the most economically important and highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals worldwide. Control of the disease has been mainly based on large-scale vaccinations with whole-virus inactivated vaccines. In recent years, a series of outbreaks of type O FMD occurred in China (including Chinese Taipei, Chinese Hong Kong) posed a tremendous threat to Chinese animal husbandry. Its causative agent, type O FMDV, has evolved into three topotypes (East-South Asia (ME-SA), Southeast Asia (SEA), Cathay (CHY)) in these regions, which represents an important obstacle to disease control. The available FMD vaccine in China shows generally good protection against ME-SA and SEA topotype viruses infection, but affords insufficient protection against some variants of the CHY topotype. Therefore, the choice of a new vaccine strain is of fundamental importance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 29% |
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,417,237
of 23,943,619 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#566
of 3,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,287
of 166,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,943,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.