The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Room4Birth - the effect of an adaptable birthing room on labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women at term with spontaneous labour start: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial in Sweden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3765-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Berg, Lisa Goldkuhl, Christina Nilsson, Helle Wijk, Hanna Gyllensten, Göran Lindahl, Kerstin Uvnäs Moberg, Cecily Begley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#21,158,537
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,551
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,612
of 480,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them