↓ Skip to main content

Cryopreservation of human vascular umbilical cord cells under good manufacturing practice conditions for future cell banks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryopreservation of human vascular umbilical cord cells under good manufacturing practice conditions for future cell banks
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Polchow, Kati Kebbel, Gerno Schmiedeknecht, Anne Reichardt, Wolfgang Henrich, Roland Hetzer, Cora Lueders

Abstract

In vitro fabricated tissue engineered vascular constructs could provide an alternative to conventional substitutes. A crucial factor for tissue engineering of vascular constructs is an appropriate cell source. Vascular cells from the human umbilical cord can be directly isolated and cryopreserved until needed. Currently no cell bank for human vascular cells is available. Therefore, the establishment of a future human vascular cell bank conforming to good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions is desirable for therapeutic applications such as tissue engineered cardiovascular constructs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Engineering 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,779,860
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#439
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,760
of 163,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.