You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PubChem3D: Conformer generation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2946-3-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan E Bolton, Sunghwan Kim, Stephen H Bryant |
| Abstract |
PubChem, an open archive for the biological activities of small molecules, provides search and analysis tools to assist users in locating desired information. Many of these tools focus on the notion of chemical structure similarity at some level. PubChem3D enables similarity of chemical structure 3-D conformers to augment the existing similarity of 2-D chemical structure graphs. It is also desirable to relate theoretical 3-D descriptions of chemical structures to experimental biological activity. As such, it is important to be assured that the theoretical conformer models can reproduce experimentally determined bioactive conformations. In the present study, we investigate the effects of three primary conformer generation parameters (the fragment sampling rate, the energy window size, and force field variant) upon the accuracy of theoretical conformer models, and determined optimal settings for PubChem3D conformer model generation and conformer sampling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 24 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,364,342
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#233
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,451
of 184,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.