↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive comparison and applications of different sections in investigating the microstructure and histochemistry of cereal kernels

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive comparison and applications of different sections in investigating the microstructure and histochemistry of cereal kernels
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-0558-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahui Xu, Cunxu Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 43%
Unspecified 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#18,710,780
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#968
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,961
of 450,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#40
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.