↓ Skip to main content

Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-11-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Zhao, Yanping Liu, Yifei Zhang, Yuhong Chen, Zhifang Yang, Ying Zhu, Weiwei Zhan

Abstract

Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed CIMT in T2DM patients over a 4-year follow-up period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#1,020
of 1,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,781
of 163,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.