You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Elie A. Akl, Joanne Khabsa, Lyubov Lytvyn, Pearl Atwere, Pauline Campbell, Kalipso Chalkidou, Stephanie M. Chang, Sally Crowe, Leonila Dans, Fadi El Jardali, Davina Ghersi, Ian D. Graham, Sean Grant, Regina Greer-Smith, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Glen Hazlewood, Janet Jull, S. Vittal Katikireddi, Etienne V. Langlois, Anne Lyddiatt, Lara Maxwell, Richard Morley, Reem A. Mustafa, Francesco Nonino, Jordi Pardo Pardo, Alex Pollock, Kevin Pottie, John Riva, Holger Schünemann, Rosiane Simeon, Maureen Smith, Airton T. Stein, Anneliese Synnot, Janice Tufte, Howard White, Vivian Welch, Thomas W. Concannon, Peter Tugwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 36% |
| Canada | 5 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 346 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 137 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 148 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,448,375
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#207
of 2,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,706
of 466,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#7
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.