You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses (AGReMA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-0915-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aidan G. Cashin, James H. McAuley, Sarah E. Lamb, Sally Hopewell, Steven J. Kamper, Christopher M. Williams, Nicholas Henschke, Hopin Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Scientists | 12 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,067,784
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#275
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,149
of 475,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.