↓ Skip to main content

The role of conversation in health care interventions: enabling sensemaking and learning

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of conversation in health care interventions: enabling sensemaking and learning
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle E Jordan, Holly J Lanham, Benjamin F Crabtree, Paul A Nutting, William L Miller, Kurt C Stange, Reuben R McDaniel

Abstract

Those attempting to implement changes in health care settings often find that intervention efforts do not progress as expected. Unexpected outcomes are often attributed to variation and/or error in implementation processes. We argue that some unanticipated variation in intervention outcomes arises because unexpected conversations emerge during intervention attempts. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of conversation in shaping interventions and to explain why conversation is important in intervention efforts in health care organizations. We draw on literature from sociolinguistics and complex adaptive systems theory to create an interpretive framework and develop our theory. We use insights from a fourteen-year program of research, including both descriptive and intervention studies undertaken to understand and assist primary care practices in making sustainable changes. We enfold these literatures and these insights to articulate a common failure of overlooking the role of conversation in intervention success, and to develop a theoretical argument for the importance of paying attention to the role of conversation in health care interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 181 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 49 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Computer Science 9 5%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,387,544
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#493
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,399
of 104,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.