↓ Skip to main content

Human CD4+ T cell subsets differ in their abilities to cross endothelial and epithelial brain barriers in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human CD4+ T cell subsets differ in their abilities to cross endothelial and epithelial brain barriers in vitro
Published in
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12987-019-0165-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Nishihara, Sasha Soldati, Adrien Mossu, Maria Rosito, Henriette Rudolph, William A. Muller, Daniela Latorre, Federica Sallusto, Mireia Sospedra, Roland Martin, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Tobias Tenenbaum, Horst Schroten, Fabien Gosselet, Britta Engelhardt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Neuroscience 16 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 40 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,965,680
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#108
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,558
of 449,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.