You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-6-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johanna I Westbrook, Mary T Westbrook, A Sophie Gosling |
Abstract |
Hospital-based clinicians have been shown to use and attain benefits from online evidence systems. To our knowledge there have been no studies investigating whether and how ambulance officers use online evidence systems if provided. We surveyed ambulance officers to examine their knowledge and use of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), an online evidence system providing 24-hour access to information to support evidence-based practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 23% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 16% |
Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,603,147
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,421
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,737
of 90,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.