↓ Skip to main content

Ovarian endometriomas and IVF: a retrospective case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovarian endometriomas and IVF: a retrospective case-control study
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-9-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Bongioanni, Alberto Revelli, Gianluca Gennarelli, Daniela Guidetti, Luisa Delle Delle Piane, Jan Holte

Abstract

We performed this retrospective case-control study analyzing 428 first-attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, among which 254 involved women with a previous or present diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis. First, the results of these 254 cycles were compared with 174 cycles involving patients with proven non-endometriotic tubal infertility having similar age and body mass index. Women with ovarian endometriosis had a significantly higher cancellation rate, but similar pregnancy, implantation and delivery rates as patients with tubal infertility. Second, among the women with ovarian endometriosis, the women with a history of laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometriomas prior to IVF and no visual endometriosis at ovum pick-up (n = 112) were compared with the non-operated women and visual endometriomas at ovum pick-up (n = 142). Patients who underwent ovarian surgery before IVF had significantly shorter period, lower antral follicle count and required higher gonadotropin doses than patients with non-operated endometriomas. The two groups of women with a previous or present ovarian endometriosis did, however, have similar pregnancy, implantation and live birth rates. In conclusion, ovarian endometriosis does not reduce IVF outcome compared with tubal factor. Furthermore, laparoscopic removal of endometriomas does not improve IVF results, but may cause a decrease of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,157,329
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#828
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,602
of 114,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.