You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Contribution of Candida biomarkers and DNA detection for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients with severe abdominal conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1324-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristóbal León, Sergio Ruiz-Santana, Pedro Saavedra, Carmen Castro, Ana Loza, Ismail Zakariya, Alejandro Úbeda, Manuel Parra, Desirée Macías, José Ignacio Tomás, Antonio Rezusta, Alejandro Rodríguez, Frederic Gómez, Estrella Martín-Mazuelos, The Cava Trem Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 7 | 11% |
Mexico | 4 | 6% |
Colombia | 3 | 5% |
France | 3 | 5% |
El Salvador | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Russia | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 32 | 27% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 36% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,138,007
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#905
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,261
of 343,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#30
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.