↓ Skip to main content

Does the institutionalization influence elderly’s quality of life? A systematic review and meta–analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the institutionalization influence elderly’s quality of life? A systematic review and meta–analysis
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Marinho Davino de Medeiros, Talita Malini Carletti, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues-Garcia

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 344 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 4%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 167 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 13%
Psychology 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Unspecified 10 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 182 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,757,190
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,266
of 3,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,354
of 476,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#39
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.