↓ Skip to main content

Exploring inequalities in access to and use of maternal health services in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring inequalities in access to and use of maternal health services in South Africa
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheetal P Silal, Loveday Penn-Kekana, Bronwyn Harris, Stephen Birch, Diane McIntyre

Abstract

South Africa's maternal mortality rate (625 deaths/100,000 live births) is high for a middle-income country, although over 90% of pregnant women utilize maternal health services. Alongside HIV/AIDS, barriers to Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care currently impede the country's Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) of reducing child mortality and improving maternal health. While health system barriers to obstetric care have been well documented, "patient-oriented" barriers have been neglected. This article explores affordability, availability and acceptability barriers to obstetric care in South Africa from the perspectives of women who had recently used, or attempted to use, these services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 494 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 22%
Researcher 68 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 12%
Student > Postgraduate 40 8%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 105 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 79 16%
Social Sciences 77 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 3%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 123 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,413,731
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,673
of 7,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,248
of 163,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#26
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.