↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
Published in
Trials, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Leiva-Fernández, Fernando Zubeldia-Santoyo, Antonio García-Ruiz, Daniel Prados-Torres, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca

Abstract

Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor inhaler technique instruction. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of two educational interventions to improve the inhalation techniques in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 97 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 19 18%