↓ Skip to main content

ERCC1 as a biomarker for bladder cancer patients likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ERCC1 as a biomarker for bladder cancer patients likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jong-Mu Sun, Ji-Youn Sung, Se Hoon Park, Ghee Young Kwon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Jisuk Jo, Han Yong Choi, Ho Yeong Lim

Abstract

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy and the value of molecular biomarkers in bladder cancer have not been determined. We aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic values of excision repair cross-complementation 1 (ERCC1) in identifying appropriate patients who may potentially benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Chemistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,099
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,344
of 164,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#34
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.