You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Peinemann, Natalie McGauran, Stefan Sauerland, Stefan Lange |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 14% |
| Librarian | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 29% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,326,948
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,882
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,256
of 82,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.