↓ Skip to main content

Improving microRNA target prediction with gene expression profiles

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving microRNA target prediction with gene expression profiles
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2695-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cesaré Ovando-Vázquez, Daniel Lepe-Soltero, Cei Abreu-Goodger

Abstract

Mammalian genomes encode for thousands of microRNAs, which can potentially regulate the majority of protein-coding genes. They have been implicated in development and disease, leading to great interest in understanding their function, with computational methods being widely used to predict their targets. Most computational methods rely on sequence features, thermodynamics, and conservation filters; essentially scanning the whole transcriptome to predict one set of targets for each microRNA. This has the limitation of not considering that the same microRNA could have different sets of targets, and thus different functions, when expressed in different types of cells. To address this problem, we combine popular target prediction methods with expression profiles, via machine learning, to produce a new predictor: TargetExpress. Using independent data from microarrays and high-throughput sequencing, we show that TargetExpress outperforms existing methods, and that our predictions are enriched in functions that are coherent with the added expression profile and literature reports. Our method should be particularly useful for anyone studying the functions and targets of miRNAs in specific tissues or cells. TargetExpress is available at: http://targetexpress.ceiabreulab.org/ .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 3%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 30%
Computer Science 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,979,702
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,356
of 10,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,906
of 326,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#98
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.