You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations – Australasian neonatal parenteral nutrition consensus update 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12887-020-1958-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Srinivas Bolisetty, David Osborn, Tim Schindler, John Sinn, Girish Deshpande, Chee Sing Wong, Susan E. Jacobs, Nilkant Phad, Pramod Pharande, Rodney Tobiansky, Melissa Luig, Amit Trivedi, Joanne Mcintosh, Eszter Josza, Gillian Opie, Lyn Downe, Chad Andersen, Vineesh Bhatia, Prasanna Kumar, Katri Malinen, Pita Birch, Karen Simmer, Gemma McLeod, Suzanne Quader, Victor Samuel Rajadurai, Michael Patrick Hewson, Arun Nair, Megan Williams, Jing Xiao, Hari Ravindranathan, Roland Broadbent, Kei Lui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#18,712,246
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,414
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,428
of 451,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#65
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.