↓ Skip to main content

Standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations – Australasian neonatal parenteral nutrition consensus update 2017

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations – Australasian neonatal parenteral nutrition consensus update 2017
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12887-020-1958-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srinivas Bolisetty, David Osborn, Tim Schindler, John Sinn, Girish Deshpande, Chee Sing Wong, Susan E. Jacobs, Nilkant Phad, Pramod Pharande, Rodney Tobiansky, Melissa Luig, Amit Trivedi, Joanne Mcintosh, Eszter Josza, Gillian Opie, Lyn Downe, Chad Andersen, Vineesh Bhatia, Prasanna Kumar, Katri Malinen, Pita Birch, Karen Simmer, Gemma McLeod, Suzanne Quader, Victor Samuel Rajadurai, Michael Patrick Hewson, Arun Nair, Megan Williams, Jing Xiao, Hari Ravindranathan, Roland Broadbent, Kei Lui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 28%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,471,019
of 16,908,873 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,705
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,225
of 332,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,908,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them