Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 104 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 30 X posts from 27 X users, with an upper bound of 72,073 followers.

RT @MarionKCampbell: There are key elements to a Delphi eg choice of rating scale, what constitutes consensus, how many rounds are needed e…

29 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @MarionKCampbell: There are key elements to a Delphi eg choice of rating scale, what constitutes consensus, how many rounds are needed e…

29 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

There are key elements to a Delphi eg choice of rating scale, what constitutes consensus, how many rounds are needed etc. These need to be clearly justified eg Lange et al showed the choice of rating scale can lead to different conclusions 3/7 https://t.co

29 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @jrboehnke: The second talk, @lee_1881 offers interdisciplinary resources supporting the use of multiple sources of evidence in COS deve…

10 Sep 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 26 additional X posts.