↓ Skip to main content

Breastfeeding cessation and symptoms of anxiety and depression: a longitudinal cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
22 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breastfeeding cessation and symptoms of anxiety and depression: a longitudinal cohort study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eivind Ystrom

Abstract

Neonatal anxiety and depression and breastfeeding cessation are significant public health problems. There is an association between maternal symptoms of anxiety and depression and early breastfeeding cessation. In earlier studies, the causality of this association was interpreted both ways; symptoms of anxiety and depression prepartum significantly impacts breastfeeding, and breastfeeding cessation significantly impacts symptoms of anxiety and depression.First, we aimed to investigate whether breastfeeding cessation is related to an increase in symptoms of anxiety and depression from pregnancy to six months postpartum. Second, we also investigated whether the proposed symptom increase after breastfeeding cessation was disproportionately high for those women already suffering from high levels of anxiety and depression during pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 348 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 20%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Researcher 19 5%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 105 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 17%
Psychology 49 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 112 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#839,322
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#150
of 4,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,307
of 168,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.