You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for inhibiting the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during propofol anesthesia: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-020-0951-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chengwei Yang, Yuanyuan Feng, Sheng Wang, Mingming Han, Song Wang, Fang Kang, Xiang Huang, Juan Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,070,496
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#601
of 1,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,304
of 449,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#17
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.