↓ Skip to main content

Resuscitation of very preterm infants with 30% vs. 65% oxygen at birth: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resuscitation of very preterm infants with 30% vs. 65% oxygen at birth: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Rook, Henk Schierbeek, Anne C van der Eijk, Mariangela Longini, Giuseppe Buonocore, Maximo Vento, Johannes B van Goudoever, Marijn J Vermeulen

Abstract

Resuscitation at birth with 100% oxygen is known to increase the oxidative burden with concomitant deleterious effects. Although fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) < 100% are widely used in preterm infants, starting resuscitation at a (too) low FiO₂ may result in hypoxia. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of resuscitating very preterm infants with an initial FiO2 of 30% versus 65%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 22 31%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Unspecified 6 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 22%