You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: The risk of cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking tumor necrosis factor antagonists: a nationwide cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13075-016-1016-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Ying Wu, Der-Yuan Chen, Jui-Lung Shen, Hsiu J. Ho, Chih-Chiang Chen, Ken N. Kuo, Han-Nan Liu, Yun-Ting Chang, Yi-Ju Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,028
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,850
of 342,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.