↓ Skip to main content

What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 656)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12941-016-0147-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vittal Mogasale, Enusa Ramani, Vijayalaxmi V. Mogasale, JuYeon Park

Abstract

Blood culture is often used in definitive diagnosis of typhoid fever while, bone marrow culture has a greater sensitivity and considered reference standard. The sensitivity of blood culture measured against bone marrow culture results in measurement bias because both tests are not fully sensitive. Here we propose a combination of the two cultures as a reference to define true positive S. Typhi cases. Based on a systematic literature review, we identified ten papers that had performed blood and bone marrow culture for S. Typhi in same subjects. We estimated the weighted mean of proportion of cases detected by culture measured against true S. Typhi positive cases using a random effects model. Of 529 true positive S. Typhi cases, 61 % (95 % CI 52-70 %) and 96 % (95 % CI 93-99 %) were detected by blood and bone marrow cultures respectively. Blood culture sensitivity was 66 % (95 % CI 56-75 %) when compared with bone marrow culture results. The use of blood culture sensitivity as a proxy measure to estimate the proportion of typhoid fever cases detected by blood culture is likely to be an underestimate. As blood culture sensitivity is used as a correction factor in estimating typhoid disease burden, epidemiologists and policy makers should account for the underestimation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 69 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 84 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,587,413
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#43
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,818
of 333,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.