Title |
MicroSAGE is highly representative and reproducible but reveals major differences in gene expression among samples obtained from similar tissues
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2003
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-r17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Seth Blackshaw, Winston P Kuo, Peter J Park, Motokazu Tsujikawa, Jenny M Gunnersen, Hamish S Scott, Wee-Ming Boon, Seong-Seng Tan, Constance L Cepko |
Abstract |
Serial analysis of gene expression using small amounts of starting material (microSAGE) has not yet been conclusively shown to be representative, reproducible or accurate. We show that microSAGE is highly representative, reproducible and accurate, but that pronounced differences in gene expression are seen between tissue samples taken from different individuals. MicroSAGE is a reliable method of comprehensively profiling differences in gene expression among samples, but care should be taken in generalizing results obtained from libraries constructed from tissue obtained from different individuals and/or processed or stored differently. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Professor | 6 | 18% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 61% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |