↓ Skip to main content

Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator-associated pneumonia response: a state of concept

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator-associated pneumonia response: a state of concept
Published in
Critical Care, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Gil-Perotin, Paula Ramirez, Veronica Marti, Jose Miguel Sahuquillo, Eva Gonzalez, Isabel Calleja, Rosario Menendez, Juan Bonastre

Abstract

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Biofilm in endotracheal tubes (ETT) of ventilated patients has been suggested to play a role in the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Our purpose was to analyze the formation of ETT biofilm and its implication in the response and relapse of VAP. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study in a medical intensive care unit. Patients mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours were consecutively included. We obtained surveillance endotracheal aspirates (ETA) twice weekly and, at extubation, ETTs were processed for microbiological assessment and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the patients were colonized based on ETA cultures. Biofilm was found in 95% of the ETTs. In 56% of the cases, the same microorganism grew in ETA and biofilm. In both samples the most frequent bacteria isolated were Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nineteen percent of the patients developed VAP (N = 14), and etiology was predicted by ETA in 100% of the cases. Despite appropriate antibiotic treatment, bacteria involved in VAP were found in biofilm (50%). In this situation, microbial persistence and impaired response to treatment (treatment failure and relapse) were more frequent (100% vs 29%, P = 0.021; 57% vs 14%, P = 0.133). CONCLUSIONS: Airway bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on ETTs are early and frequent events in ventilated patients. There is microbiological continuity between airway colonization, biofilm formation and VAP development. Biofilm stands as a pathogenic mechanism for microbial persistence, and impaired response to treatment in VAP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 28 12%
Other 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 56 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,130
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,480
of 177,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#57
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.