↓ Skip to main content

Defining the vital condition for organ donation

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining the vital condition for organ donation
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-2-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinaldo Bellomo, Nereo Zamperetti

Abstract

The issue of organ donation and of how the donor pool can or should be increased is one with significant practical, ethical and logistic implications. Here we comment on an article advocating a paradigm change in the so-called "dead donor rule". Such change would involve the societal and legal abandonment of the above rule and the introduction of mandated choice. In this commentary, we review some of the problems associated with the proposed changes as well as the problems associated with the current model. We emphasize the continuing problems with the definition of death and the physiological process of dying; we discuss the difficulties associated with a dichotomous view of death; we review the difficulties with non-beating heart donation and emphasize the current limitations of society's understanding of these complex issues. We conclude that public education remains the best approach and that such education should not be merely promotion of a particular ideology but honest debate of what is socially and morally acceptable and appropriate given the changes in vital organ support technology and the need to respect patient autonomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Philosophy 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%