↓ Skip to main content

Continuous haemofiltration in the intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous haemofiltration in the intensive care unit
Published in
Critical Care, October 2000
DOI 10.1186/cc718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinaldo Bellomo, Claudio Ronco

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was first described in 1977 for the treatment of diuretic-unresponsive fluid overload in the intensive care unit (ICU). Since that time this treatment has undergone a remarkable technical and conceptual evolution. It is now available in most tertiary ICUs around the world and has almost completely replaced intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) in some countries. Specially made machines are now available, and venovenous therapies that use blood pumps have replaced simpler techniques. Although, it remains controversial whether CRRT decreases mortality when compared with IHD, much evidence suggests that it is physiologically superior. The use of CRRT has also spurred renewed interest in the broader concept of blood purification, particularly in septic states. Experimental evidence suggests that this is a promising approach to the management of septic shock in critically ill patients. The evolution and use of CRRT is likely to continue and grow over the next decade.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 23%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 12 14%