You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014–2017 field seasons: genotype, phenotype, climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-020-4922-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bridget A. McFarland, Naser AlKhalifah, Martin Bohn, Jessica Bubert, Edward S. Buckler, Ignacio Ciampitti, Jode Edwards, David Ertl, Joseph L. Gage, Celeste M. Falcon, Sherry Flint-Garcia, Michael A. Gore, Christopher Graham, Candice N. Hirsch, James B. Holland, Elizabeth Hood, David Hooker, Diego Jarquin, Shawn M. Kaeppler, Joseph Knoll, Greg Kruger, Nick Lauter, Elizabeth C. Lee, Dayane C. Lima, Aaron Lorenz, Jonathan P. Lynch, John McKay, Nathan D. Miller, Stephen P. Moose, Seth C. Murray, Rebecca Nelson, Christina Poudyal, Torbert Rocheford, Oscar Rodriguez, Maria Cinta Romay, James C. Schnable, Patrick S. Schnable, Brian Scully, Rajandeep Sekhon, Kevin Silverstein, Maninder Singh, Margaret Smith, Edgar P. Spalding, Nathan Springer, Kurt Thelen, Peter Thomison, Mitchell Tuinstra, Jason Wallace, Ramona Walls, David Wills, Randall J. Wisser, Wenwei Xu, Cheng-Ting Yeh, Natalia de Leon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,395,880
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#157
of 4,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,444
of 472,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#3
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.