You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drought and heat stress tolerance screening in wheat using computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00565-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Schmidt, Joelle Claussen, Norbert Wörlein, Anja Eggert, Delphine Fleury, Trevor Garnett, Stefan Gerth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#906,849
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#21
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,933
of 482,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.