You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taking the ‘I’ out of LLINs: using insecticides in vector control tools other than long-lasting nets to fight malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-3151-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krijn P. Paaijmans, Silvie Huijben |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Malawi | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,956,923
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#353
of 5,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,486
of 468,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#7
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.