↓ Skip to main content

Nasogastric tube feeding versus assisted hand feeding in-home healthcare older adults with severe dementia in Taiwan: a prognosis comparison

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nasogastric tube feeding versus assisted hand feeding in-home healthcare older adults with severe dementia in Taiwan: a prognosis comparison
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12877-020-1464-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsiao-Hui Chou, Meng-Ting Tsou, Lee-Ching Hwang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Librarian 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 33 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 31 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,133,284
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,994
of 3,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,734
of 485,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.